Compare AI models: Hy3 vs Grok 4.7

Hy3Tencent
Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Hy3	67/100	68/100	79/100	53/100	0/100	40/100
Grok 4.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	71/100	24/100	75/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Tencent

xAI

Context length

256K

500K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text

Text, Image, Pdf

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Tencent

xAI

Pricing

Input

$0.07/ 1M

$2.00/ 1M

Output

$0.26/ 1M

$6.00/ 1M

Cached input

$0.03/ 1M

$0.50/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

85K

50K

Completed sessions

701,438

121,038

Token share

0.04%

0.01%

Tokens

458B-93%

64B+100%

AUG 30OCT 24

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

70.1%2.9K user-weeks

44.7%1.2K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeHy3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy3Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonHy3 vs Jamba MiniHy3Jamba Mini Related comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7Jamba Mini