Compare AI models: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.7
- Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 17/100 | 93/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$10/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
4.3K
50K
Completed sessions
10,575
121,038
Token share
0%
0.01%
Tokens
21B+100%
64B+100%
AUG 30OCT 24
AUG 30OCT 24
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
44.7%1.2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3.1 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Jamba MiniKimi K3.1 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba Mini