GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor	100/100	90/100	80/100	93/100	83/100	100/100
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	67/100	82/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

1M

1M

Reasoning

True

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio

Text, Image, Video

Output modalities

Text

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.10/ 1M

$0.15/ 1M

Output

$0.20/ 1M

$0.60/ 1M

Cached input

$0.002/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

1.5M

924K

Completed sessions

373,185,242

125,487,596

Token share

20.9%

16.4%

Tokens

240T+100%

188T+100%

AUG 30OCT 24

AUG 30OCT 24

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

69.8%49K user-weeks

76.4%10K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3 ContributorDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-FlashDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 ContributorJamba Mini Related comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-FlashJamba Mini