GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Pro

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. MiMo-V2-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10083/10082/10033/10092/100
MiMo-V2-Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder35/10093/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.05/ 1M
$1.00/ 1M
Output
$0.21/ 1M
$3.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.001074/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.4M
2.8K
Completed sessions
89,897,982
8,278
Token share
33.5%
0%
Tokens
383T+100%
00%
AUG 30OCT 24
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.