Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Grok 4.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- Grok 4.5xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 77/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| Grok 4.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 90/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 57/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.07/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.30/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0015/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.5M
6.4K
Completed sessions
91,002,254
38,114
Token share
33.7%
0%
Tokens
388T+100%
669M-99%
AUG 30OCT 24
AUG 30OCT 24
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
46.4%373 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.5 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.5·Jamba Mini