Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.4 Pro
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-5.4 ProOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 77/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GPT-5.4 Pro | 86/100 | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 0/100 | 98/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.07/ 1M
$30/ 1M
Output
$0.30/ 1M
$180/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0015/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.5M
0
Completed sessions
91,002,254
1
Token share
33.7%
0%
Tokens
388T+100%
00%
AUG 30OCT 24
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-5.4 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-5.4 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-5.4 Pro vs Jamba MiniGPT-5.4 Pro·Jamba Mini