Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	56/100	100/100	70/100	82/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	34/100	84/100	63/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.10/ 1M

$0.05/ 1M

Output

$0.60/ 1M

$0.20/ 1M

Cached input

$0.003/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

32K

237K

Completed sessions

527,611

7,229,715

Token share

0.09%

0.39%

Tokens

1.1T+100%

4.4T+133%

AUG 30OCT 24

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.