Compare AI models: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 28/100 | 71/100 | 11/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 22/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 69/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$3.17/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$16/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.32/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1
924K
Completed sessions
26
125,490,804
Token share
0%
16.3%
Tokens
3.1M+100%
188T+100%
AUG 30OCT 24
AUG 30OCT 24
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
76.4%10K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Sonnet 4.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Sonnet 4.6·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Sonnet 4.6 vs Jamba MiniClaude Sonnet 4.6·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba Mini